DISTRICT WISE NEWS

अंबेडकरनगर अमरोहा अमेठी अलीगढ़ आगरा आजमगढ़ इटावा इलाहाबाद उन्नाव एटा औरैया कन्नौज कानपुर कानपुर देहात कासगंज कुशीनगर कौशांबी गाजियाबाद गाजीपुर गोण्डा गोरखपुर गौतमबुद्धनगर चन्दौली चित्रकूट जालौन जौनपुर ज्योतिबा फुले नगर झाँसी देवरिया पीलीभीत फतेहपुर फर्रुखाबाद फिरोजाबाद फैजाबाद बदायूं बरेली बलरामपुर बलिया बस्ती बहराइच बागपत बाँदा बांदा बाराबंकी बिजनौर बुलंदशहर बुलन्दशहर भदोही मऊ मथुरा महराजगंज महोबा मीरजापुर मुजफ्फरनगर मुरादाबाद मेरठ मैनपुरी रामपुर रायबरेली लखनऊ लख़नऊ लखीमपुर खीरी ललितपुर वाराणसी शामली शाहजहाँपुर श्रावस्ती संतकबीरनगर संभल सहारनपुर सिद्धार्थनगर सीतापुर सुल्तानपुर सोनभद्र हमीरपुर हरदोई हाथरस हापुड़

Saturday, June 2, 2018

हाथरस : पदोन्नति में आरक्षण एवं परिणामी ज्येष्ठता सम्बन्धी न्यायालय के आदेश एवं सचिव परिषद के आदेश के अनुपालन में पदावनति की कार्यवाही 2 माह में करने हेतु मा0 उच्च न्यायालय का नवीन आदेश, देखें

हाथरस : पदोन्नति में आरक्षण एवं परिणामी ज्येष्ठता सम्बन्धी न्यायालय के आदेश एवं सचिव परिषद के आदेश के अनुपालन में पदावनति की कार्यवाही 2 माह में करने हेतु मा0 उच्च न्यायालय का नवीन आदेश, देखें

Court No. - 58
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13391 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ravi Kant Mishra
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Kumar Sharma,Vikas
Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Akhilesh Chandra
Srivastava
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
The petitioner, who is working as an Assistant Teacher in Upper
Junior Primary High School, Block and District Hathras, has
preferred the instant writ petition seeking a mandamus directing
the third respondent to pass orders relating to demotion of all
teachers in the district, who had been granted promotion by
granting them the benefit of reservation. It is submitted that the
Supreme Court in the case of U P Power Corporation Ltd.
Versus Rajesh Kumar & others, 2012 Law Suit (SC) 245, has
held Rule 3(7) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Servants
(Reservation for Schedule Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other
Backward Classes) Act, 1994 to be ultra vires. It is submitted
that the Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad had
issued directions to all the Regional Assistant Director of
Education (Basic) on 9 November 2015 to ensure
implementation of the judgment of the Supreme Court in their
respective regions. The grievance of the petitioner is that in
district Varanasi, the judgment of the Supreme Court has not
been enforced, as the third respondent has till date not passed
any order of demotion.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner
has already represented in this regard before the third
respondent and he may be directed to consider the same, to
which learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent
No. 1 and Sri A. C. Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent
Nos. 2 to 4, do not have any objection.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the
third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner
in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of
Rajesh Kumar (supra), and the directions issued by the
Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad, vide letter dated
9 November 2015, expeditiously and preferably within a period
of two months from the date of communication of this order .
Order Date :- 31.5.2018
Ashok Kr.

No comments:
Write comments